Kara
Kara
Kentucky
Female
Married

Is Palin "one of us" by association?

Posted: 9/3/2008 at 07:29 PM

  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

member(s) liked this post.

Can you believe it's only been a few days since John McCain announced Alaskan Governor, Sara Palin, as his choice for Vice President? The media buzz makes me feel like it's been decades. For the first two days after Palin's candidacy, the only bits of her biography that I knew for sure involved motherhood and her high school basketball career. I'm not sure what relevance these have to her political prowess, but that doesn't seem to matter in much of the coverage for this election. The fact that Sarah Palin had a child with Down Syndrome in April of this year is old news! Now we're on to the important matter of her oldest daughter's pregnancy, which will undoubtedly impact matters of international policy, oil prices, and healthcare reform.

The rest of the world might have moved on, but many in the disability community are still captivated by the fact Sarah Palin just might be "one of us!" Having a child with a disability can offer a window to our culture that even those outside the family can't fully understand. My own mother doesn't have a disability herself, but she's experienced discrimination, pain, determination, and cultural appreciation through me. Her empathy translates into her role as a powerful advocate in the school system. She's not a positive contributor to our community simply because she gave birth to me, but because of how she chose to raise me AND what she does for other people with disabilities.

[Photo caption: Sarah Palin smiling.]

I have no doubt that Sarah Palin is an excellent mother, but I'm not evaluating her parenting skills. I'm impressed by her reflection on discovering the diagnosis of her son. In an e-mail to friends and family the day of her son Trig's birth, Palin stated in , ""Many people will express sympathy, but you don't want or need that, because Trig will be a joy…Children are the most precious and promising ingredient in this mixed-up world…Trig is no different, except he has one extra chromosome." I'm hopeful about Palin's intolerance for pity. But this, my friends, sums up evidence that Palin's addition to the Republican ticket is a positive sign for the disability community.

The vast majority of Palin's publicized statements about Trig's birth focus not on people with disabilities, access, inclusion, education, or healthcare-but on her staunch stance on pro-life. Sarah Palin recalled her and her husband's reaction to Trig's diagnosis in an interview with the Associated Press, "We've both been very vocal about being pro-life. We understand that every innocent life has wonderful potential." With well over 80% of fetuses diagnosed with Down Syndrome ending in abortion, Sarah Palin and her family did make a unique choice-and one that I support. However, this doesn't indicate any sort of allegiance to the disability community at large.

An advocate that I admire, Lawrence Carter-Long, said it best on a comment to Patricia E Baur's blog,

"There seems to be a division between the more conservative mothers of children born with Down syndrome who are lining up on Palin's side and those who would rather link disability to other social justice and progressive causes. Having a child with Down syndrome is not, perhaps, the only criteria one should meet before they are considered a pro-disability candidate."

I completely agree. To further speculate, Palin's status as a mother of a child with a disability could actually make her a negative choice for Vice President. It's my hope for Trig that she will become a competent and confident advocate for him, but many parents embrace a paternalistic attitude of expertise. I'm already wary of signs of exploitation in the repeated use of family pictures featuring only Sarah Palin, her husband, and her youngest son. Of course, that was before the announcement of the teenage pregnancy. I don't like the feeling that Trig's disability is being used-for either side of the abortion controversy. I'd rather hear Sarah Palin discuss her views on the quality of early intervention services available for her child than still patting herself on the back for choosing to have him.

[Photo caption: Sarah Palin and her husband pose with her newborn son, Trig.]

I hope that I'm wrong and that Sarah Palin has some hidden history, present, and future strategic plan on her policies for people with disabilities. I'm thankful her son, Trig, is one of us, but her role beyond enthusiastic young mother has yet to be determined.

 

What do you think?

To get you started...here is a comment on Palin from a reader of my blog on Obama's choice for VP:

SoonerBoomer said, " Now we know that McCain has chosen Palin for his VP and in Absolutely NO Way can Biden compare to a Mother of a Special Needs Child for Sensitivity to Disabilities!"

1,107 Views
  • share this:
  • Email to a Friend
  • Digg It!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine

Your comment may take up to 15 minutes to appear.

Some HTML is allowed in the comments. See the list.
  • Nightengale wrote on Sep 3, 2008 at 9:19 PM
    I'm going to decide if she's "one of us" based on her policies for civil rights for people with disablities. Does she support community supports so adults with disabilities can live in the community? Does she support health care that helps people with disablities get the equipment they need? Does she support funding NCLB including special education? If president, would she appoint justices to the supreme court who think it's OK to fire someone for having a chronic illness or that its OK to carry someone up a flight of stairs to appear in court? Those are the criteria I use to judge if a candidate is "for us." Right now I know she is for her son, but that alone does not tell me if she truly supports the rights of other people with disabilites.
  • DSB wrote on Sep 3, 2008 at 11:06 PM
    Kara she is and will be a care giver. I do respect her choice but she is young and the baby is just a baby. I am not an expert with Downs other then knowing givien the right medical treatment they can have a normal life span and ability to live independent vary. But she and hubby are care givers and in ways are the one to empower that child to have their own voice/
  • Kara wrote on Sep 4, 2008 at 12:56 AM
    @Nightengale: That's how I felt...Like her party has complained about a lack of details from Obama's promises to "change", I need to know the HOW behind her pledge to the "FAMILIES of special needs CHILDREN" as she said tonight. She's in "mom mode" even with her statements...that's great for Trig but I'm not so sure what that means for adults with disabilities. @DSB I respect her choice as well...You're right-parents are the first ones that can empower their children. They can promote or squelch their voice. I need to know more about Palin's plans/policies because simply knowing she's a caregiver doesn't help me feel comfortable.
  • Thursday Thirteen – If the World had Wheels wrote on Sep 4, 2008 at 2:42 PM
    Pingback from Thursday Thirteen – If the World had Wheels
  • Michael B. Gerber wrote on Sep 4, 2008 at 5:06 PM
    Are we one issue voters? Do we support a candidate because we think that they will be sympathetic to our cause and on that basis only? I hope not. Palin is the new parent of a child with down syndrome and I applaud her for her choice to raise the child. But down syndrome is only one disability. For many of us, the great hope and promise in medical research is in stem cells, a research strongly opposed to and not funded by our current administration. Generally speaking, stem cell research is opposed by most Republican lawmakers. I am absolutely certain that with Palin's strong Pro-Life stance, she is opposed to embryonic stem cell research. On the other hand, Michelle Obama witnessed her father's health deteriorate from his Multiple Sclerosis (which I have) and I don't have to ask her, her husband or almost any other democratic lawmaker if they would support stem cell research. I know they would. I will save most of my political commentary for another day. For now, if you are a 'one issue' voter, be sure and get all the facts before choosing.
  • Mama wrote on Sep 4, 2008 at 7:39 PM
    This election has devoured logic and reason at times to present the candidate with the highest rating on the "crisis" meter. The ordeal of spilling out the pain the candidate has gone through confuses the total issue. I had hoped candidates would plant the seeds to a more connected leadership in our nation. I know that at the election time all sides are split........on my opinion of Palin, I think she may grab some idea from the past like.....Ask not what you can do for disabilities, ask what disabilities can do for you...and your election.
  • Bob Phillips wrote on Sep 5, 2008 at 8:10 AM
    I am disgusted by the question. She doesn't need "the community's" approval to be "one of us". She has a child with special needs and we stand with families with special needs. It is not a political question or a status earned by ideology. She is because he is. Period. And, shame on you.
  • MustangSally wrote on Sep 5, 2008 at 10:11 AM
    @ Bob Phillips - Shame on you for trying to squelch this conversation. Obviously Ms. Palin is a parent of a child with a disability and therefore a part of the community. Kara's question is broader than that and one I have too. Palin claims she will be an advocate for families if elected, but I can't find any evidence that she has been an advocate in the past. The closest I can find is her line-item veto to cut pledged funding for a community agency that serves homeless and pregnant teens. Not an auspicious start. If anyone has any other information I would love to see it. As we all know, there is a big difference between talking the talk and walking the walk. I think we all have the right to ask questions and look at her past actions as indications of her future behavior.
  • Inquiring Mind wrote on Sep 5, 2008 at 11:14 AM
    Unfortunately, merely being a parent of a child with a disability doesn't necessarily make a person aware of all the issues affecting not just people with Downs Syndrome, but also other people with disabilities. The lack of transparency we're seeing from the campaign where she is concerned should worry us all. Not only has the McCain campaign sought to mislead people on when exactly she was "vetted", they wrote her convention speeches (which, although well-delivered, prompted an article headline that included the words "stretching the truth"). They shielded her from reporters, so all we really know is what we've discovered via media reports (not much good-abuse of office, book-banning, debt, lying about the bridge to nowhere, etc.) and what McCain's campaign has chosen to reveal to us. As Michael says, "get all the facts" first. Don't make a decision just because she has a child with a disability.
  • Jan S. wrote on Sep 5, 2008 at 11:17 AM
    I'm sure Sarah Palin and her husband will be advocates for her son as most parents are. But this does not translate into support for the disabilites community through legislation. Look at John McCain. He does not have a very good track record of supporting legislation to help veterans and their families.